I agree with you. I myself use photoshop. But when you think about it, it's sometimes better to just leave images as they are, as they were created. Sometimes it can destory photography, sometimes it can make it better. It really just depends I guess. I think were so used to wanting to make things better and creating art to its fullest potential that we don't care that were just basically morphing the image we took into something its capable of being rather then leaving it be. That's why I think film photography is such a beautiful thing, in most cases they aren't morphed. They are frozen moments in time that look exactly like they are shown in the picture. Haha anyway, sorry to get so deep on you lol

--
how could I have missed this awesomeness

gallery [link]
FlickR [link]

thank you

--
NOT THE CAMERA CREATES A PICTURE, BUT THE EYE

irgendwie hast du recht....wenn man von sich behauptet ein [guter] fotograf zu sein, muss man auch zeigen, dass was man auch ohne PS o.ä. gute Sachen machen kann...ich kenne ein paar gute, die höchstens Schnitt ändern, sonst bleibt alles wie es ist. da muss man schon ein Auge dafür haben.
andersseits ein bisschen PS schadet nicht